| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
| Date: | 2014-09-03 20:22:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1409775738.77167.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
>> What are the interactions with search_path?
>
> Pretty much the same as the interactions of RTEs with search_path.
> If the apparent relation name is not schema-qualified, parse
> analysis first tries to resolve the name as an RTE, and if that
> fails it tries to resolve it as a named tuplestore, and if that
> fails it goes to the catalogs using search_path.
Argh. s/RTE/CTE/
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-09-03 20:33:53 | Re: pgcrypto: PGP signatures |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-09-03 20:13:52 | Re: Display of timestamp in pg_dump custom format |