| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 15:23:14 |
| Message-ID: | 14041.1295536994@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> OK, I am ready to move test_fsync to /contrib. Is pg_test_fsync the
>> best name? pg_check_fsync? pg_fsync_performance? pg_verify_fsync?
> I don't see too much reason to rename it more than necessary, so how
> about pg_test_fsync?
Yeah, there's no reason to try to confuse people about whether it's
the same program or not.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-20 15:28:25 | Re: Include WAL in base backup |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-01-20 15:22:01 | Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump |