Re: creating index names automatically?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: creating index names automatically?
Date: 2009-12-23 21:15:44
Message-ID: 13944.1261602944@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Dec 23, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh ... I don't see what that fixes? If CONCURRENTLY can be a column
>> name this is still ambiguous.

> How?

Because CONCURRENTLY can still be reduced as tricky_index_name, so
it still doesn't know how to parse CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2009-12-23 21:17:03 what about _PG_fini
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-12-23 20:57:57 Re: creating index names automatically?