| From: | Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | pg_rewarm status |
| Date: | 2013-12-16 17:02:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1387213366.16498.YahooMailNeo@web122905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up.
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com)
I'm
trying to experiment with some new hardware - and the functionality to
add specific tables/indexes into cache ahead of time will benefit me
greatly.
I found a page describing how to apply the patch to 9.2.4 (jumping through some hoops - http://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/UCJEPS-432) and was hoping to get a version to apply to 9.3.X
Can
anyone advise me on how I might get this 'applied' to a 9.3.X source
code base or any other options to denote specific relations that I'd
like to get directly into shared_buffers?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-16 17:07:10 | Re: logical changeset generation v6.8 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-16 16:52:58 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |