Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3
Date: 2013-12-08 16:15:36
Message-ID: 1386519336.31519.11.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 09:45 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> There is still valid a variant to move check function to contrib for
> fist moment.

If we are not happy with the code or the interface, then moving it to
contrib is not a solution. We are still committed to main things in
contrib indefinitely.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-08 16:43:46 Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-08 16:12:56 Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3