Re: MultiXact bugs

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MultiXact bugs
Date: 2013-11-27 23:14:11
Message-ID: 1385594051.66603.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid() ignores aborted updaters
> and returns InvalidTransactionId in that case, but
> HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() returns HEAPTUPLE_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS...

That sure *sounds* like it should cause a problem for this code in
CheckForSerializableConflictOut():

    htsvResult = HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum(tuple, TransactionXmin, buffer);
    switch (htsvResult)
    {
        [ ... ]
        case HEAPTUPLE_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS:
            xid = HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid(tuple->t_data);
            break;
        [ ... ]
    }
    Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(xid));

... however, I have not been able to trigger that Assert even with
gdb breakpoints at what I think are the right spots.  Any
suggestions?  How far back is it true that the above
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() can return HEAPTUPLE_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS
but HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid(tuple->t_data) on the exact same
tuple structure can return InvalidTransactionId?  Is there some
other condition (besides a ROLLBACK of an UPDATE on the tuple being
read) which needs to be met?  Is any particular timing necessary?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-11-27 23:17:16 Re: Modify the DECLARE CURSOR command tag depending on the scrollable flag
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-27 23:09:23 Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3