Re: Platform-dependent(?) failure in timeout handling

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Platform-dependent(?) failure in timeout handling
Date: 2013-11-27 14:34:24
Message-ID: 1385562864.77858.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> 3. Establish a coding rule that if you catch an error with
> PG_TRY() and don't re-throw it, you have to unblock signals in
> your PG_CATCH block.

Could that be done in the PG_END_TRY macro?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hafez Kamal 2013-11-27 15:23:52 [HITB-Announce] #HITB2014AMS Call for Papers Now Open
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-11-27 14:31:43 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation