Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date: 2013-11-22 21:07:29
Message-ID: 1385154449.90877.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> are you sure it also unsets default_transaction_readonly for
> the roles etc. it creates?

I'm not sure I understand.  Could you give an example of what
you're concerned about?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-11-22 21:09:30 Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 21:02:28 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-11-22 21:09:30 Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 21:02:28 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency