| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Date: | 2013-11-22 20:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1385153125.34312.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> That looks sane for pg_dump, but I would rather have expected
> that pg_dumpall would need to emit the same thing (possibly more
> than once due to reconnections).
I was kinda surprised myself. I changed it for pg_dump, tested
that, and then tested pg_dumpall to get a baseline, and the setting
was taken care of.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Boyd | 2013-11-22 20:52:46 | Easiest way to CREATE EXTENSION when upgrading from 9.0 to 9.2? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-22 20:33:01 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-22 20:51:45 | Re: Building on S390 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-22 20:33:01 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |