| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK |
| Date: | 2013-11-05 21:48:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1383688092.58848.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-11-05 12:21:23 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>>
>>> Looks fine to me
>>
>> Any thoughts on whether this should be back-patched to 9.3? I
>> can see arguments both ways, and don't have a particularly
>> strong feeling one way or the other.
>
> Hehe. I was wondering myself. I'd tentatively say no - unless we
> also backpatch the debugging patch there doesn't seem to be good
> reason to since the likelihood of conficts due to it doesn't seem
> very high.
Works for me. Done.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-11-05 21:57:38 | Re: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-05 21:45:49 | Re: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations |