Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Date: 2013-11-05 20:21:23
Message-ID: 1383682883.22910.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>

> Looks fine to me

Any thoughts on whether this should be back-patched to 9.3?  I can
see arguments both ways, and don't have a particularly strong
feeling one way or the other.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-05 20:26:37 Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-05 19:59:09 Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK