Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments

From: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Date: 2013-11-05 17:52:40
Message-ID: 1383673960881-5777056.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Janes wrote
> Some experiments I did a few years ago showed that applying sorts to the
> data to be inserted could be helpful even when the sort batch size was as
> small as one tuple per 5 pages of existing index. Maybe even less.

Cool!!! Do you have any idea/hint on how I could try and replicate that?
Do you remember how you did it?

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Fast-insertion-indexes-why-no-developments-tp5776227p5777056.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2013-11-05 17:58:11 Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Previous Message Leonardo Francalanci 2013-11-05 17:51:16 Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments