| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
| Date: | 2013-09-16 04:54:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1379307264.16217.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 14:28 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 15/09/2013 13:58, I wrote:
> > Hmm. I just noticed there's something weird going on in the select_view
> > test. I'm investigating this currently.
>
> Seems that there's some magic going on and I overwrote the expected
> results of the wrong file. However, I can't figure out how one is
> supposed to be getting the output of expected/select_views.out, nor do I
> find this documented anywhere (I know xml has a similar thing so I tried
> grepping around for XML, to no avail).
>
> Here's an updated patch, but I think expected/select_views.out is still
> broken.
You patch still fails the plperl regression tests.
I don't see a failure with select_views. Your issue might be that you
updated expected/select_views_1.out but not expected/select_views.out.
This documentation might help:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/regress-variant.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2013-09-16 05:06:00 | Re: [PATCH] bitmap indexes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-09-16 04:47:16 | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information |