Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions)
Date: 2013-08-24 14:44:01
Message-ID: 1377355441.8206.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 21:29 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is our current work-in-progress patch for WITHIN GROUP.

Please fix these compiler warnings:

parse_agg.c: In function ‘check_ungrouped_columns_walker’:
parse_agg.c:848:3: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘check_ungrouped_columns_walker’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
parse_agg.c:822:1: note: expected ‘struct Node *’ but argument is of type ‘struct List *’

parse_func.c: In function ‘make_fn_arguments’:
parse_func.c:1540:9: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
parse_func.c:1547:15: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-08-24 14:47:31 Re: Backup throttling
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-08-24 14:41:18 Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL