From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false |
Date: | 2012-08-14 21:34:02 |
Message-ID: | 13725.1344980042@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
>>> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
>>> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.
>> I would be in favor of that.
> I have implemented this with the patch at:
> http://momjian.us/expire/true_diff.txt
Does this really do anything for us that will justify the extra
back-patching pain it will cause? I don't see that it's improving
code readability any.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-14 21:36:35 | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false |
Previous Message | Michael Braun | 2012-08-14 21:03:41 | Re: superusers are members of all roles? |