| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2 |
| Date: | 2011-01-23 03:13:43 |
| Message-ID: | 1372.1295752423@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So I don't want to give up the details of the function
>> or operator. But sticking them at the end after a colon might make it
>> clearer that the func/operator is referenced by the amproc or amop
>> entry, but is not the same thing.
> That seems like an improvement over the status quo, so do you want to
> go ahead and do that?
Are you voting to commit the patch I presented plus that change, or do
something different?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-23 03:23:57 | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-23 03:12:16 | Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers |