Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
Date: 2014-02-06 22:51:48
Message-ID: 1371.1391727108@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-02-06 16:35:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Thoughts?

> Let's let it stew a while in master, there certainly are enough
> subtleties around this that I'd hesitate to add it to a point release in
> the not too far away future. Doesn't seem that urgent to me. But after
> that I'd say lets backpatch it.

Seems reasonable to me. The urgency would go up if we could positively
trace any field trouble reports to this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2014-02-06 23:06:36 Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-06 22:50:22 Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext