Re: Git conversion status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Date: 2010-09-20 17:49:49
Message-ID: 13690.1285004989@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 19:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Please fix and re-run.

> Uh, what the heck. I ran the exact same command as last time.. Hmm:
> Stefan rbeooted the machine in between, I wonder if that changed
> something.

I'm not sure we ever checked that. My comparisons against the tarballs
were done from my own run of the conversion script. I'm using C locale
here, probably you aren't?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2010-09-20 17:50:04 Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation?
Previous Message Markus Wanner 2010-09-20 17:45:41 Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements