Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2013-04-05 16:23:05
Message-ID: 1365178985.14231.84.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 03:34 +0200, Ants Aasma wrote:
> The main thing to look out for is that we don't
> have any blind spots for conceivable systemic errors. If we decide to
> go with the SIMD variant then I intend to figure out what the blind
> spots are and show that they don't matter.

Are you still looking into SIMD? Right now, it's using the existing CRC
implementation. Obviously we can't change it after it ships. Or is it
too late to change it already?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2013-04-05 16:31:54 Re: CREATE EXTENSION BLOCKS
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-04-05 14:59:48 Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)