Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> giving an error so its an easy to find distinction to a normal
> table seems like a good idea.

I'm not sure I understood your concerns entirely, but wonder
whether this helps?:

test=# \d
              List of relations
 Schema | Name  |       Type        |  Owner
--------+-------+-------------------+---------
 public | bb    | materialized view | kgrittn
 public | t     | table             | kgrittn
 public | tm    | materialized view | kgrittn
 public | tmm   | materialized view | kgrittn
 public | tv    | view              | kgrittn
 public | tvmm  | materialized view | kgrittn
 public | tvv   | view              | kgrittn
 public | tvvm  | materialized view | kgrittn
 public | tvvmv | view              | kgrittn
(9 rows)

test=# truncate table tm;
ERROR:  "tm" is not a table
test=# truncate materialized view t;
ERROR:  "t" is not a materialized view
test=# truncate materialized view tm;
TRUNCATE TABLE
test=# truncate table t;
TRUNCATE TABLE

Well, maybe those command tags could use a tweak.

Then there's this, if you don't specify an object type:

test=# truncate t, tm;
TRUNCATE TABLE

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company