Re: Event Triggers: adding information

On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 08:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >>> Also, keep in mind we want the ObjectID in all CREATE, ALTER and DROP
> >>> statements, so my current patch is still some bricks shy of a load… (I
> >>> added ObjectID only in the commands I added rewrite support for, apart
> >>> from DROP).
> >>
> >> I shall rely on you to provide those bricks which are still missing.
> >
> > Please find attached a patch to change most functions called from
> > standard_ProcessUtility() to return an Oid (passes `make
> > maintainer-clean; configure; make install check`). Most of them only,
> > because it only make sense for functions touching an object that exists
> > in the catalogs and have a distinct Oid.
>
> OK, I committed this.

There is a new compiler warning coming from this, I believe:

copy.c: In function ‘DoCopy’:
copy.c:835:2: error: ‘relid’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
return relid;
^
copy.c:753:6: note: ‘relid’ was declared here
Oid relid;
^