Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2012-12-04 08:11:46
Message-ID: 1354608706.2638.2.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 13:16 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 3 December 2012 09:56, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think the way forwards for this is...
> >
> > 1. Break out the changes around inCommit flag, since that is just
> > uncontroversial refactoring. I can do that. That reduces the noise
> > level in the patch and makes it easier to understand the meaningful
> > changes.
>
> Done.

Thank you.

One minor thing I noticed: it looks like nwaits is a useless variable.
Your original checksums patch used it to generate a warning, but now
that is gone. It's not throwing a compiler warning for some reason.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-12-04 08:14:46 Re: Hot Standby conflict resolution handling
Previous Message Christian Ullrich 2012-12-04 07:40:13 Bug in buildfarm client