Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dan Ports <drkp(at)cs(dot)washington(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Question about SSI, subxacts, and aborted read-only xacts
Date: 2012-09-11 07:13:13
Message-ID: 1347347593.22899.53.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 11:15 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> That's a fair point. Do you have any suggested wording, or
> suggestions for exactly where in the documentation you think it
> would be most helpful? The subsection on serializable transactions
> seems like the most obvious location:

Attached. I thought about putting it as a "note", but it seems like it's
easy to go overboard with those.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

Attachment Content-Type Size
ssi_doc.patch.gz application/x-gzip 926 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru HANADA 2012-09-11 09:30:02 Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-09-11 06:43:20 Re: gistchoose vs. bloat