Re: -Wformat-zero-length

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Date: 2012-08-07 14:38:52
Message-ID: 1344350312-sup-6268@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie ago 03 16:02:28 -0400 2012:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I
> > >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all. Are we
> > >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin? That seems a
> > >> strange policy.
> > >
> > > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then.
> >
> > I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of
> > robustness that I'm not sanguine about. Granted, putting it in
> > contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than
> > is perhaps warranted. But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in
> > src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to
> > filing down the rough edges.
>
> I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges.

So do you have a list of rough edges?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2012-08-07 14:54:12 Re: WIP: pg_pretty_query
Previous Message Thom Brown 2012-08-07 14:36:59 Re: WIP: pg_pretty_query