From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: -Wformat-zero-length |
Date: | 2012-08-07 14:38:52 |
Message-ID: | 1344350312-sup-6268@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie ago 03 16:02:28 -0400 2012:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I
> > >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all. Are we
> > >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin? That seems a
> > >> strange policy.
> > >
> > > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then.
> >
> > I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of
> > robustness that I'm not sanguine about. Granted, putting it in
> > contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than
> > is perhaps warranted. But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in
> > src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to
> > filing down the rough edges.
>
> I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges.
So do you have a list of rough edges?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-08-07 14:54:12 | Re: WIP: pg_pretty_query |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2012-08-07 14:36:59 | Re: WIP: pg_pretty_query |