Re: isolation check takes a long time

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: isolation check takes a long time
Date: 2012-07-24 05:14:24
Message-ID: 1343106864.21442.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2012-07-20 at 13:15 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 09:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Meanwhile, I would like to remove the prepared_transactions test from
> > the main isolation schedule, and add a new Make target which runs that
> > test explicitly. Is there any objection to that?
> >
> >
>
>
> Here's the patch for that.

Why was this backpatched to 9.1? That doesn't seem appropriate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-07-24 05:24:11 ALTER command reworks
Previous Message Adam Crews 2012-07-24 02:02:45 Re: postgres 9 bind address for replication