Re: Schema version management

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Date: 2012-07-13 19:36:13
Message-ID: 1342208173.23760.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2012-07-11 at 17:20 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> operator_!___numeric.sql (postfix, name does not need escape)
> operator_%7C%2F_integer__.sql (prefix)
> operator_%3C_bit_varying__bit_varying.sql (type name with spaces,
> changed to _)

I'm not sure if it makes things better to escape some operator names and
some not. It could easily become confusing.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-07-13 19:41:27 Re: Schema version management
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-07-13 19:34:35 Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string?