| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-07 19:46:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1341690236-sup-4978@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Aidan Van Dyk's message of sáb jul 07 11:32:33 -0400 2012:
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no
> > C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an
> > extension.
>
> Nobody is claiming that pgdump shouldn't dump it.
>
> But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an
> appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into?
I was thinking that it might make sense to group operators according to
the type(s) they operate on, somehow. Using funny chars for names is
guaranteed to cause problems somewhere.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-07 19:46:26 | Re: regex_fixed_prefix() is still a few bricks shy of a load |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-07-07 19:35:33 | Re: pg_prewarm |