| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets |
| Date: | 2012-06-13 22:29:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1339626585.11971.50.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2012-06-12 at 14:47 +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
> This could be true in case all listening ports are equal, which I
> guess isn't a good idea, because IIUIC the port number as a part of
> the socket name is used for distinguish sockets of various postmasters
> in the same directory. In that scenario every client should know which
> port to connect and also which one is primary.
Why? The client won't care which port is primary or secondary or
whatever as long as it reaches the server.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-13 22:31:31 | Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-13 22:28:08 | Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets |