| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-11 21:36:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1334180206.25392.39.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2012-04-11 at 14:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I hear you ... but, given that the source material is a mailing-list
> thread, *somebody* has to do all that work to produce an acceptable
> commit. And if you're just going to commit what that somebody sends
> you without further review, then you might as well give that person a
> commit bit, because you're trusting them to get all this right.
I'd still review it, but I'd be able to spend say 3 minutes on review
and 30 seconds on committing it, versus 3 minutes on review, 3 minutes
on research, and 8 minutes on bookkeeping.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-11 21:44:32 | About bug #6579 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-04-11 21:29:48 | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity |