| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-09 21:14:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1334006081.17681.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2012-04-07 at 16:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Even before this CommitFest, it's felt to me like this hasn't been a
> great cycle for reviewing. I think we have generally had fewer people
> doing reviews than we did during the 9.0 and 9.1 cycles. I think we
> had a lot of momentum with the CommitFest process when it was new, but
> three years on I think there's been some ebbing of the relative
> enthusiastic volunteerism that got off the ground. I don't have a
> very good idea what to do about that, but I think it bears some
> thought.
But the patches left in the current commit fest all have gotten a decent
amount of reviewing. The patches are still there because the reviews
have identified problems and there was not enough development time to
fix them. I don't think more reviewing resources would have changed
this in a significant way.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-04-09 21:59:43 | Re: bug in fast-path locking |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-09 20:11:32 | Re: bug in fast-path locking |