From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alex <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission |
Date: | 2012-04-05 22:10:25 |
Message-ID: | 1333663521-sup-937@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue abr 05 13:52:13 -0300 2012:
> On ons, 2012-03-28 at 01:49 +0300, Alex wrote:
> > Attached is a gzipped v10, complete with the above fixes and fixes to
> > bugs found by Heikki. Documentation and code comments are also
> > finally updated.
>
> The compiler warning is still there:
>
> fe-connect.c: In function ‘conninfo_parse’:
> fe-connect.c:4122:20: error: unused variable ‘option’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
Here's an updated patch, including this fix and others. (Most notable
the fact that I got rid of conninfo_store_uri_encoded_value, instead
expanding conninfo_storeval a bit). I also fixed the test script to run
in VPATH. I intend to commit this shortly, barring objection from Peter
who is listed as "committer" in the CF app.
I think the only thing I'm not really sure about is the usage of the
<synopsis> tag to mark example URIs in the docs. It looks to me that
they should mostly be <literal> instead, but I'm not really sure about
that either -- I'm suspecting the PDF output would look rather horrible.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
libpq-uri-v11.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 10.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2012-04-05 22:22:10 | System catalog typos |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-04-05 22:02:27 | Re: Last gasp |