From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Date: | 2012-03-05 18:11:41 |
Message-ID: | 1330970654-sup-8562@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of lun mar 05 13:02:50 -0300 2012:
> small fix of CheckFunctionById function
>
> Regards
>
> p.s. Alvaro, please, send your patch and I'll merge it
Here it is, with your changes already merged. I also added back the
new reference doc files which were dropped after the 2012-01-01 version.
Note I haven't touched or read the plpgsql checker code at all (only
some automatic indentation changes IIRC). I haven't verified the
regression tests either.
FWIW I'm not going to participate in the other thread; neither I am
going to work any more on this patch until the other thread sees some
reasonable conclusion.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
check_function-2012-03-05-1.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 32.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-05 18:14:02 | Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-03-05 18:02:45 | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? |