Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2012-03-05 02:54:36
Message-ID: 1330915985-sup-3759@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of dom mar 04 16:33:08 -0300 2012:
>
> Hello
>
> 2012/3/4 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:

> >                     CHECK FUNCTION
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >  In function: 'f()'
> >  error:42P01:2:sentencia SQL:no existe la relación «foo»
> >  query:select                                           +
> >  var                                                    +
> >  from                                                   +
> >  foo
> >                       ^
> > (4 filas)
> >
>
> this should be fixed. I checked expressions, that works (I expect)
> correctly. Caret helps - (really). Sometimes man is blind :).

Agreed.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-05 03:52:30 Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-05 01:53:53 Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work