Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-26 10:38:09
Message-ID: 1317033489.1759.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2011-09-24 at 14:02 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The semantics are clear: recovery.conf is read first, then
> postgresql.conf. It's easy to implement (1 line of code) and easy to
> understand.

What's clear about that? My intuition would have been that
recovery.conf is read second.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message crocket 2011-09-26 10:41:16 Is there any plan to add unsigned integer types?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-26 10:35:17 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf