Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-18 14:14:32
Message-ID: 1316355273.12186.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-09-16 at 08:59 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
> You're missing my point completely. You say you represent PostgreSQL
> on the SQL Committee (or German working group, but that's not the
> point), yet the PostgreSQL hackers didn't know that, and were making
> other plans less than 2 years ago. For me, a representative would have
> been reporting back to us after each meeting, and discussing points to
> raise before each meeting - not working in isolation, without the
> knowledge of others.

Let's not get into legalese. I don't think Susanne's point was the she
was the sole and authoritative representative of the project. An
alternative way to phrase this might be that she has been the only
participant in committee meetings that has had PostgreSQL's concerns on
her mind.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-18 14:19:02 Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-18 14:08:05 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?