| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)codelibre(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
| Date: | 2009-11-23 14:30:58 |
| Message-ID: | 13156.1258986658@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> What is the plan behind keeping the old format? Are we going to remove
> it after one release if no one complains, or are we seriously expecting
> that someone has code that actually parses this?
Plan? Do we need a plan? The extra support consists of about two lines
of code and a small table, so there wouldn't be much harm in leaving
it there forever.
On the other hand it seems pretty likely that no one would care after a
release or two.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-23 14:31:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-11-23 14:29:31 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove -w (--ignore-all-space) option from pg_regress's diff |