From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Subject: | Re: lock_timeout GUC patch |
Date: | 2010-01-20 16:03:27 |
Message-ID: | 13126.1264003407@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2010/1/20 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
>> Attached with the proposed modification to lift the portability concerns.
> I think that it is a very bad idea to implement this feature in a way
> that is not 100% portable.
Agreed, this is not acceptable. If there were no possible way to
implement the feature portably, we *might* consider doing it like this.
But I think more likely it'd get rejected anyway. When there is a
clear path to a portable solution, it's definitely not going to fly
to submit a nonportable one.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-20 16:14:23 | Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-20 15:42:11 | Re: lock_timeout GUC patch |