From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Timestamp to time_t |
Date: | 2009-09-15 15:50:07 |
Message-ID: | 13023.1253029807@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:02:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> EXTRACT()?
> I see that EXTRACT() can take a time zone as input, but I don't see
> anywhere that could distinguish among the following inputs, once
> stored, as they have identical representations in UTC:
See TIMEZONE_HOUR, TIMEZONE_MINUTE field specifications, in particular
b) Otherwise, let TZ be the interval value of the implicit
or explicit time zone associated with the <datetime value
expression>. If <extract field> is TIMEZONE_HOUR, then the
result is calculated as
EXTRACT (HOUR FROM TZ)
Otherwise, the result is calculated as
EXTRACT (MINUTE FROM TZ)
I haven't tracked down whether the phrase "implicit or explicit time
zone" is hiding any interesting weasel words, but it sure *looks* like
you are supposed to be able to pull out the TZ offset.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2009-09-15 16:00:30 | Can the PostgreSQL weekly news be retrospectively edited? |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2009-09-15 15:45:26 | Re: PGCluster-II Progress |