Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthew Draper <matthew(at)trebex(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
Date: 2011-04-05 20:47:40
Message-ID: 1302036460.27487.38.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-04-05 at 14:45 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Talking about the standards compliance of functions is a bit silly:
> our implementation of functions isn't even close to approximating what
> looks to be the standard

That doesn't mean it couldn't be better in the future. We shouldn't
take it further away, in any case.

As long as we use LANGUAGE SQL, we are both technically and morally in
standards-space.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-04-05 20:51:31 Re: Extensions Dependency Checking
Previous Message Aidan Van Dyk 2011-04-05 20:42:16 Re: Extensions Dependency Checking