Re: Sync Rep v19

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19
Date: 2011-03-03 19:17:53
Message-ID: 1299179873.10703.545.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 00:02 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> + else if (WaitingForSyncRep)
> + {
> + /*
> + * This must NOT be a FATAL message. We want
> the state of the
> + * transaction being aborted to be
> indeterminate to ensure that
> + * the transaction completion guarantee is
> never broken.
> + */
>
> The backend can reach this code path after returning the commit to the
> client.
> Instead, how about doing this in EndCommand, to close the connection
> before
> returning the commit?

I don't really understand this comment.

You can't get there after returning the COMMIT message. Once we have
finished waiting we set WaitingForSyncRep = false, before we return to
RecordTransactionCommit() and continue from there.

Anyway, this is code in the interrupt handler and only gets executed
when we receive SIGTERM for a fast shutdown.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-03-03 19:27:58 Re: Time zone database
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-03-03 19:14:54 Re: Quick Extensions Question