Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?
Date: 2009-10-19 22:45:03
Message-ID: 12991.1255992303@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Would postgres get considerably cleaner if a hypothetical 9.0 release
> skipped backward compatibility and removed anything that's only
> maintained for historical reasons?

Yeah, and our user community would get a lot smaller too :-(

Actually, I think any attempt to do that would result in a fork,
and a consequent splintering of the community. We can get away
with occasionally cleaning up individual problematic behaviors
(example: implicit casts to text), but any sort of all-at-once
breakage would result in a lot of people Just Saying No.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-19 22:45:33 Re: per table random-page-cost?
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2009-10-19 22:38:36 Re: LATERAL