Re: multiple -f support

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multiple -f support
Date: 2011-02-06 22:18:58
Message-ID: 1297030738.1770.3030.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 12:07 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
> > something we don't want.
>
> IIRC, nobody objected to the basic concept, and it seems useful. I
> thought we were pretty close to committing something along those lines
> at one point, actually. I don't remember exactly where the wheels
> came off.
>
> Maybe a TODO?

As Andrew pointed out, IIRC, you can do this with a little shell
programming already.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-06 22:31:13 pgsql: Force strings passed to and from plperl to be in UTF8 encoding.
Previous Message Brar Piening 2011-02-06 22:06:21 Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support