| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: Extensions support for pg_dump |
| Date: | 2011-01-17 15:57:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1295279637-sup-9642@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Anssi Kääriäinen's message of lun ene 17 12:41:25 -0300 2011:
> While it is not possible to drop functions in extensions, it is possible
> to rename a function, and also to CREATE OR REPLACE a function in an
> extension. After renaming or CORing a function, it is possible to drop
> the function.
Hmm, this seems a serious problem. I imagine that what's going on is
that the function cannot be dropped because the extension depends on it;
but after the rename, the dependencies of the function are dropped and
recreated, but the dependency that relates it to the extension is
forgotten.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-17 16:02:21 | test_fsync open_sync test |
| Previous Message | Anssi Kääriäinen | 2011-01-17 15:41:25 | REVIEW: Extensions support for pg_dump |