| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: wCTE behaviour |
| Date: | 2010-12-22 18:25:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1293042311.15493.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2010-12-21 at 13:20 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:14:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> > > On 2010-11-12 8:25 PM +0200, I wrote:
> > > > I'm going to take some time off this weekend to get a patch with this
> > > > behaviour to the next commitfest.
> > >
> > > .. and a wild patch appears.
> > >
> > > This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
> > > CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges and
> > > needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway.
> >
> > To pick up an earlier thread again, has any serious thought been given
> > to adapting the SQL2001/DB2 syntax instead of our own?
>
> Yes, and it's a good deal more limited and less intuitive than ours.
Less intuitive, possibly, but how is it more limited?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-12-22 18:28:29 | "writable CTEs" |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-12-22 18:24:10 | Re: wCTE behaviour |