Re: wCTE behaviour

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wCTE behaviour
Date: 2010-12-21 21:14:31
Message-ID: 1292966071.31439.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 2010-11-12 8:25 PM +0200, I wrote:
> > I'm going to take some time off this weekend to get a patch with this
> > behaviour to the next commitfest.
>
> .. and a wild patch appears.
>
> This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
> CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges and
> needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway.

To pick up an earlier thread again, has any serious thought been given
to adapting the SQL2001/DB2 syntax instead of our own?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2010-12-21 21:17:49 Comment typo in nodeWindowAgg.c
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-12-21 20:32:28 Re: [FeatureRequest] Base Convert Function