Re: pl/python improvements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/python improvements
Date: 2010-12-08 21:41:44
Message-ID: 1291844504.31214.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-12-07 at 23:56 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> Peter suggested having a mail/patch per feature and the way I intend
> to do that is instead of having a dozen branches, have one and after
> I'm done rebase it interactively to produce incremental patches that
> apply to master, each one implementing one feature.

Fair enough if you want to do it that way, but I'd encourage you to just
send in any self-contained features/changes that you have finished.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-12-08 21:47:40 Re: serializable read only deferrable
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-12-08 21:33:53 Re: wCTE behaviour