| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
| Date: | 2010-12-08 15:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1291821779.2872.922.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:26 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Why would multiple bgwriter processes worry you?
Because it complicates the tracking of files requiring fsync.
As Greg says, the last attempt to do that was a lot of code.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-08 15:36:21 | Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-12-08 15:20:49 | Re: Solving sudoku using SQL |