Re: profiling connection overhead

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead
Date: 2010-12-07 02:37:01
Message-ID: 1291689244-sup-7391@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun dic 06 23:09:56 -0300 2010:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> Please explain more precisely what is wrong with SET SESSION
> >> AUTHORIZATION / SET ROLE.
> >
> > 1) Session GUCS do not change with a SET ROLE (this is a TODO I haven't
> > had any time to work on)
> >
> > 2) Users can always issue their own SET ROLE and then "hack into" other
> > users' data.
>
> Makes sense. It would be nice to fix those issues, independent of
> anything else.

It seems plausible to fix the first one, but how would you fix the
second one? You either allow SET ROLE (which you need, to support the
pooler changing authorization), or you don't. There doesn't seem to be
a usable middleground.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-12-07 02:37:25 Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-12-07 02:32:48 Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4