Re: unlogged tables

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-11-16 19:49:17
Message-ID: 1289936957.31200.22.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2010-11-13 at 19:16 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> 1. The first one (relpersistence-v1) is a mostly mechanical patch that
> replaces pg_class.relistemp (a Boolean) with pg_class.relpersistence
> (a character), so that we can support more than two values. BE SURE
> YOU INITDB, since the old catalog format will not work with this patch
> applied.

Btw., I would recommend that even in-progress or proposed patches
include catversion updates, which helps communicate the message such as
yours in a more robust manner and also reduces the chance of forgetting
the catversion change in the final commit.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jignesh Shah 2010-11-16 19:49:38 possible concurrency bug or mistake in understanding read-committed behavior
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-16 19:44:17 Re: Explain analyze getrusage tracking