Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date: 2010-10-17 22:58:21
Message-ID: 1287356301.12624.2.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 15:52 -0700, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> > configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.
> >
>
> If only we knew someone in Redhat :)

Fortunately for those in the know, you can get --integer-datetimes with
Red Hat. My information was a little outdated.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-10-18 00:20:14 Re: ask for review of MERGE
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-10-17 22:52:35 Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types